Thursday, April 14, 2011

The Smokescreen That Hides the Truth

Here's the thing, the NFL owners could right now implement The Legacy Fund. The NFLPA Former Players requested the $10 million per team savings in 2010 to be used to create the fund. Those savings came from the owners not having to pay benefits to the players due to the uncapped year. That's $320 million that would've seeded the fund. They flat out refused. Don't buy into the divisive tactics that are being employed right now. Let stand behind the leadership and the class and make them show us why they won't.

Monday, April 11, 2011

NFLPA Former Players Message April 8, 2011







April 8, 2011


CLASS ACTION

NFL Players Agree to Mediation Under Oversight of Federal Court

April 7, 2011

Washington, D.C. – The class of NFL players wrote to Judge Susan Nelson today, embracing
her recommendation to participate in mediation under the oversight of the federal court
of Minnesota.

Though the injunction to lift the owners' lockout remains under Judge Nelson's
consideration, the players took to heart her advice given during Wednesday's hearing that
the two sides should not delay to meet.

The players expressed their hope that mediation under court oversight will begin
immediately.

To view the letter sent by the Brady class to Judge Nelson, click
here
and scroll down.


Opening George's Mailbag

In an effort to engage more directly and substantively with NFL fans, George Atallah
will respond to several questions every Monday in his new mailbag feature on
www.nfllockout.com. While many of the questions
will likely focus on the business of the
NFL and the current lockout, it should be noted that the NFLPA renounced its status as the
union for NFL players and all discussions related to collective bargaining occurred before
the CBA expired on March 11th. NFL fans can send questions anytime to the email address
mailbag@nflplayers.com. Questions and answers
will be posted every Monday.

1) Question from P. Davis: Thanks for taking the time to respond. Andrew Brandt at
nationalfootballpost.com said that the cap portion of the $141M proposal was $114M. I
haven't seen that elsewhere. Can you confirm that? And I totaled the player expenses
(sal + ben) from Forbes for 2009, and it totaled $140M. That was when the cap was $124M +
the cam adj. If that $114M proposed cap figure is correct, does that mean that there was a
converse bump in proposed benefits?

Brandt also suggests that the owners were prepared to go up to $121M for that cap figure. I'm curious if anyone has plugged these numbers in at the team level to see how many teams would project over that cap figure and by how much. Would teams have to make several hard/disadvantageous roster decisions including cuts and restructures to get under the proposed cap number?

And that expense credit has been poorly described in the press. I take it the owner's are asking to broaden what can be counted as a credit. What could be counted previously, and what are they looking to add as credits in the future CBA?

And as a compromise on the 18 game schedule, has any thought been given to add 2 more bye weeks instead of additional games? It would expand the TV schedule/season, and give teams added rest/recovery, addressing the safety concerns both sides have.

George: Thanks for your email. Lots to unpack here.

Let me tackle the first question regarding the salary cap. The last time we had a salary cap, there were basically two numbers that comprised it: player salaries and player benefits. The benefits number was roughly $25 million. I can't get into the specifics of the actual numbers in this space, but I can point you to this post for a description of why what you're describing was a huge problem for the players. Players – not lawyers – plugged in the NFL's proposed numbers to see if they would work. Players would have had to take an unjustified reduction in pay if they would have agreed to that proposal.

To answer your question regarding the expense credits, the owners' initial proposal included a broad exclusion of costs that were never there before. There are long lists of credits that were counted under the last CBA, including things like stadium construction, NFL Network, etc. Under their initial proposal, cost credits would have incorporated things like professional fees, travel and other overhead. So, yes, in its most simple form, the owners asked to broaden what would have been counted as a "credit".

For the 18 game schedule or season, there was a point where the players proposed acceptable terms for an 18 game schedule that included much more than what you mention with regards to health and safety. The NFL basically said 'no' to that proposal. Over time and as more health and safety issues were being revealed, players said that they won't play 18 games.

Here are two critical posts that help explain the issues you raised:

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/03/13/making-sense-of-the-financial-divide-between-the-two-sides/ and http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=ap-nfllabor-thenumbers

Thanks for your questions. Keep the dialog going.

Click to view more.


BENEFITS

Great News!

Due to the advocacy of the NFLPA Former Player leadership, the NFL owners have finally put in writing that they will continue the 5 year medical coverage for continuing veterans. The benefits were scheduled to end August 31, 2011.

Back to top


HEALTH

What You Most Need to Know

by Patricia Barry for AARP Bulletin

You're a boomer. The milestone of your 65th birthday may be here or just over the horizon. But you know zip about Medicare. Do you need it? What does it cover? When should you sign up? Lots of questions — but don't panic. You can get your head around Medicare with this guide to what you most need to know.

Click to view the article.

Back to top


Ibuprofen May Protect Against Parkinson's Disease

by Katharine Greider for AARP Bulletin

People who take ibuprofen two or more times a week are considerably less likely to develop Parkinson's disease than those who don't take the drug, according to a study published online March 2 in the journal Neurology.

The finding suggests this common over-the-counter painkiller (sold under brand names that include Advil, Motrin and Nuprin) may actually protect the brain against the degeneration that produces the symptoms of Parkinson's, including shaking, muscle stiffness and other difficulties with movement and coordination.

Back to top


NEWS

Nolan Harrison Calls Richardson/Murphy Letter 'Absolute Nonsense'

by Dan Graziano for Pro Player Insiders

Earlier this week, Carolina Panthers owner Jerry Richardson and Green Bay Packers team president Mark Murphy sent a letter to retired players detailing some of the benefits they would have received if the NFLPA had agreed to the league's March 11 proposal. As a former player, Nolan Harrison received the letter…

Click to view the article.

Back to top


BUSINESS

IRS: Top 10 Tips for Tax Time

by IRS, for IRS.gov

Editor's note: This content is provided by the Internal Revenue Service. Consult your financial or tax adviser regarding your individual situation.

It's that time of the year again. The income tax filing season has begun and important tax documents should be arriving in the mail. Even though your return is not due until April, getting an early start will make filing easier. Here are the Internal Revenue Service's top 10 tips that will help your tax filing process run smoother than ever this year.

Click to view the article.

Back to top


PHOTO OF THE WEEK


Back to top


Monday, March 7, 2011

For the lucky 32, the NFL is a league of their own

By Sally Jenkins


Washington Post Staff Writer

Saturday, March 5, 2011; 1:48 AM

I am The Owner and I am a powerful man, a man of vast resources, someone to be reckoned with. And not just a powerful man, but a handsome one, too. Do you know how much money I have? Enough to sit astride my city like a colossus. Understand this: The truth is what I say it is. Why? Because I'm rich.

Also, I am handsome. Don't you think so? Try telling me I'm not. I'll be contacting the league negotiators. I bet I can make you say so.

The wonderful part of being The Owner is that I own things. I own so many things that it's given me the impression I own, well, everything. The biggest thing I own, of course, is my NFL team, which I particularly enjoy because it gives me the sensation that I own people. At the moment the NFL Players Association is trying to tell me I don't really own all the little men down on the field, that I only rent them for a price. But they will soon discover that they are merely "fungible assets" and "labor costs."

As I like to say to Peyton Manning and Drew Brees when they question my vast sense of ownership, "Son, do you need help reading a revenue chart?"

As The Owner, I rely on the gargantuan stream of NFL revenue, $9 billion a year, to help me own all of my other things. I personally made an average of $33 million in 2009 according to Forbes, but that is not quite enough to comfortably pay for all that I own - the boats, and planes, and mansions in Palm Beach and Aspen, and my vineyard, and so I am asking for more.

I own a black limousine with tinted windows, so that I can see out but you can't see in. I like to leave it running, even in the midst of an oil crisis, so the climate inside is just right. I enjoy controlling the climate. Why? Because I can. It makes me feel as though I even own the weather. Do you know what the temperature is? It's what I say it is.

As The Owner, I am far and away the most important person in the league. Proof of that is the fact that I am a billionaire. Do you know how I made my billion dollars? By being The Owner! All I had to do was sit in my Owner's Box, and the value of my franchise quadrupled over 10 years. In 1997 the average NFL team was worth $205 million. By 2007 it increased to $898 million, and all I did was watch! Lucky me! Of course, the luckiest ones are The Owners by birthright. Nine of us inherited our teams, like duchy.

As The Owner, I feel entitled to make the most money of anybody, ever. I really don't understand why players get 60 percent of the league revenue - I mean, after we Owners take the first $1 billion off the top. When players make too much money, it makes me feel that I don't really own as much as I should. It threatens my sense that I am a powerful man, a man of vast resources, someone to be reckoned with. And not just a powerful man, but a handsome one, too.

Whenever I doubt that, I check the tail number on my Gulfstream, and remind myself that as The Owner, I am recession-proof. In the worst economy in history, not one NFL team lost money! That's because 18 of us raised ticket prices in 2010, and do you know what? People paid it! They paid for stale popcorn and flat beer, and even bought "personal seat licenses." Which should tell you who really owns the seats: I do! Munificently, I am willing, in exchange for a hefty fee, to grant the temporary right to sit in them.

As The Owner, I am so supremely powerful that I can reduce entire cities to beggardom.

Not even the president of the United States is as powerful as me, because I have the power to stop play. It's a heady sensation to know that I have the emotions of an entire country on a string, which I can jerk at a whim. In Washington, The Owner can even bring senators and chief executives to helpless tears. Like Gordon Gekko said, "You're not naive enough to think we're living in a democracy are you?"

Occasionally, I get the feeling that being The Owner hasn't endeared me to my neighbors. Some people don't understand how billionaires could demand an additional $1 billion in concessions from players whose careers last an average of just three years, and suffer an assortment of degenerative joint and brain injuries. Hey, I have my own health risks: last night at dinner I got a shrimp tail stuck under my fingernail and stubbed my toe on a Krugerrand.

A judge has even accused me of "harming the interest of the players" by trying to hoard TV money. That forced me to soften my stance in the labor dispute in the last 24 hours.

It turns out that insisting on an extra billion dollars for no other reason than I want it isn't going to fly in the court of public opinion, or of law. It's time to negotiate.

So now I'm only demanding an extra $800 million.

Whenever I doubt myself, I turn to my ultimate source of inspiration, the source from which I learned everything I know: DC Comics.

I leaf through the pages studying my mentor, the man I model my behavior after: Lex Luthor, the multinational industrialist and super-genius who seeks world domination through a series of clever business machinations.

As Lex Luthor once said: "We all have our little faults. Mine's in California."

I am such a genius at being The Owner that I can make people believe I own things I never actually paid for: stadiums, for instance. Jerry Jones, The Owner of the Dallas Cowboys, got the city of Arlington, Tex., to give him $325 million to jump-start construction of a new palace, and on top of that he charged fans "personal seat licenses" of up to $50,000 apiece to help pay for it. Taxpayers and ticket-buyers picked up most of the $1.2 billion tab, but guess who The Owner of the stadium is? Jones! And as The Owner, he made $143 million in 2009!

That sort of thing is why NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell has predicted that NFL revenue will grow from $9 billion to $27 billion by 2025.
You know what that means, don't you? I will own more than ever. Soon you will answer to me, all of you. Because I am The Owner, a man of vast resources and one to be reckoned with.

Also, handsome.

Sunday, March 6, 2011

NFL owners: 'Who needs $4 billion?' and other negotiating tales

By Tracee Hamilton


Washington Post
Wednesday, March 2, 2011; 9:14 PM

The most ridiculous statement I've read this week came from Charlie Sheen. (In fact, most of the ridiculous statements made in America so far this week have come from Charlie Sheen.)

Sheen's statement was this: "Yeah, I am on a drug. It's called Charlie Sheen. It's not available because if you try it once, you will die. Your face will melt off, and your children will weep over your exploded body. Too much?"

Moammar Gaddafi called; he wants to know how to score some of that Adonis DNA.

The second-most ridiculous statement I've read this week came from Greg Aiello, the NFL's senior vice president of public relations, in the wake of Judge David S. Doty's ruling that the NFL was not, after all, entitled to collect as much as $4 billion from its television partners during a potential lockout.

Aiello's job is to sound the NFL's trumpet, but get a load of this: "Today's ruling will have no effect on our efforts to negotiate a new, balanced labor agreement."

Both Sheen and Aiello's statements are similar in that they are, in fact, completely nuts. The difference: Sheen is seriously disturbed; the NFL is just messing with us.

If, say, two days ago you were owed $4 billion dollars and now you're not, you're either making Charlie Sheen money - or you're going to bounce a few checks down the road. There is no question the NFL is flush, but owners were counting on that TV money to get them through the lockout in the style to which they've become accustomed - and if any was left, maybe they would keep paying assistant coaches and beer vendors.

The decision by Doty, who has been the overlord of the NFL's collective bargaining agreement since 1993, overturned a February ruling by special master Stephen Burbank. Doty will hold a hearing to determine if damages are warranted; the NFL, not surprisingly, will appeal.

But neither of those things will happen before 11:59 p.m. Thursday, when the CBA is set to expire. The two sides will continue to meet with federal mediators - distracting them from the more pressing matter of Sheen vs. CBS et al. But at least CBS can still make money off "Two and a Half Men" reruns - 11.6 million of you should be ashamed of yourselves for making Monday night's the most watched show of the evening. I don't know about you, but I'm not sitting through the 2010 Redskins season for a second time.


So the Day after Doty, with the deadline approaching, are we any closer to a resolution? Not really, no. The loss of what amounted to a lockout slush fund will hurt the owners, but it's more of a "Bill Gates misplacing his wallet" pain than a crippling blow.

Sadly, this thing could drag on longer than Charlie Sheen's rants. It could be a long summer.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Let's not let the NFL spin machine talk down a great victory by De Smith and the NFLPA staff! This is what fighting for the rights of all players is all about. This is two huge victories for the legal team. The first was the American Needle case and now the TV Revenue case. Both have had major ramifications for the current CBA and have set the tone for the current bargaining sessions. Let's keep the pressure up, and the volume up, in support for the great job De Smith, Kevin Mawae, Cornelius Bennett and the NFLPA staff are doing fighting for all of us!

One Team

Nolan Harrison III
Sr. Director
NFLPA Former Players Services

 



Saturday, March 5, 2011

Sen. Jay Rockefeller urges NFL should open their books the NFLPA

ESPN.com: NFL

WASHINGTON -- The chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee is urging NFL owners to open their financial books to the players' union, arguing that will help resolve a labor dispute.

"Reluctantly, I have come to the conclusion that the only way to sort out this stalemate is for the owners and the league to answer the biggest sticking point: money," Sen. Jay Rockefeller wrote in a Washington Post opinion column on Friday. "What I'd like to see from NFL commissioner Roger Goodell and the owners is a simple display of good faith: Show the union your books. Don't keep secrets. If there are financial pressures that keep you from agreeing to the revenue-sharing plan proposed by the players, let's see the proof."

Rockefeller, D-W.Va., suggested that a neutral third party review the financial data, remove anything sensitive and prepare an assessment of the league's finances.
 
The NFL declined to comment on Rockefeller's suggestion, citing a request by federal mediator George Cohen that the two sides not discuss negotiations while they're in mediation. Those negotiations are scheduled to resume next week.

The league has previously said that the union, which has made similar demands, already has access to all relevant financial information.

The biggest sticking point between the two sides is how to divide about $9 billion in annual revenues. The current collective bargaining agreement expires at 11:59 p.m. ET Thursday, and the union has said it expects a lockout to come as soon as the following day.

The NFL hasn't argued that it's losing money, only that it needs to keep a bigger share to finance costs such as stadium construction.

Rockefeller acknowledged that "some owners make significant investments while managing a professional sports team and I don't want to play down their long-term expenses and obligations. But the players deserve a good-faith effort to demonstrate that these expenses are real and not just an excuse."

He said that so far, he's kept a "hands-off" approach to the negotiations, aside from conversations on the status of the talks.

But he also said that Congress, "acting in the public interest, has to keep the NFL on track because of the great benefits given to the league by federal law and taxpayer funds and because of its impact on the nation's economy."

One key benefit that the NFL enjoys -- along with other professional sports -- is an antitrust exemption for broadcasting contracts. That exemption, which allows the NFL to sign TV contracts on behalf of all teams, helped to transform the league into the economic powerhouse it is today.

As to what the committee will do if the NFL doesn't provide the information, Rockefeller spokesman Vince Morris said that the senator is keeping all options open but is mainly focused on encouraging the two sides to sort this out themselves.

Gary Roberts, dean of Indiana University Law School in Indianapolis and an expert on sports, antitrust and labor law, said that whether an employer is required to open its books depends on what it argues during the collective bargaining process.

"If owners make representations that they're losing money or that they can't afford a certain term in the collective bargaining agreement, then they're obligated to prove their assertion," he said.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In my personal opinion Gary Roberts said it best, and of course I'm not being biased being because he is representing Indiana University, the owners are obligated to prove why the players need to take a $1 billion pay cut, to prove why hundreds of thousands of people will be put out of work when there is a lockout, to prove how record viewership and $9 billion in revenue is not a successful business model.

Nolan Harrison III
Senior Director
NFLPA
Former Players Services

Former Players Message March 4, 2011

March 4, 2011

We have had 10 days of mediation, and the CBA expiration deadline has been extended twice; once for 24 hours, and again for seven days. Former Players Board of Directors Chairman Cornelius Bennett, and Board of Director Jim McFarland have been in every mediation session advocating for the Legacy Fund, increased benefits, and pensions for all former players. Never have we had such a strong voice for former player issues at the bargaining table. As you know, this is the result of a unanimous vote by the Current Players Board of Representatives at the meetings in March of last year. We are now seeing the results of that vote, and I could not be more proud. We are truly one voice, one locker room, and one team. As you might also know, we won the television revenue case. Judge Doty on Tuesday reversed the previous ruling so that the NFL, as of today, cannot use those funds until they have a hearing to decide whether it will go into escrow or another remedy. The most important part is that the $4 billion cannot be used against us in the current CBA negotiations.

We held three national conference calls with our former players on Wednesday and Thursday of this week to make sure that everyone was up to speed on the issues surrounding the current CBA negotiations. We had unprecedented participation, and I anticipate more conference calls to keep you all updated and informed as we move forward in this process. One of the main issues we discussed was continuing the veterans' five year medical care benefit ending August 31, 2011. We should advocate that Commissioner Goodell state, both publicly and in writing, that he will not end those benefits that those vested players have earned. I've spoken to the NFL Alumni Association, to their credit, say that they will publicly support our position. Additionally, keep those petitions coming in for the Legacy Fund.

As you know, right now, solidarity is the key. Anything you see and read out there that is divisive and not inclusive of all players serves only one purpose - to undermine our goals of increasing the quality of life for all players.

One Team,

Nolan Harrison III
Senior Director
NFLPA Former Player Services